By Paul Portner
It is a publication approximately semantic theories of modality. Its major aim is to give an explanation for and evaluation very important modern theories inside of linguistics and to debate a variety of linguistic phenomena from the point of view of those theories. The creation describes the range of grammatical phenomena linked to modality, explaining why modal verbs, adjectives, and adverbs symbolize the center phenomena. Chapters are then dedicated to the potential worlds semantics for modality built in modal common sense; present theories of modal semantics inside of linguistics; and crucial empirical components of study. the writer concludes via discussing the relation among modality and different subject matters, particularly annoying, element, temper, and discourse meaning.Paul Portner's obtainable advisor to this key region of present learn might be welcomed through scholars of linguistics at graduate point and above, in addition to by way of researchers in philosophy, computational technology, and comparable fields.
Read or Download Modality (Oxford Surveys in Semantics and Pragmatics) PDF
Similar semantics books
This paintings provides a unified thought of point inside common Grammar. It presents an strange blend of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic techniques to a unmarried area, and provides exact linguistic analyses of 5 languages with very diverse aspectual platforms: English, French, Mandarin chinese language, Navajo and Russian.
During this brief monograph, John Horty explores the problems provided for Gottlob Frege's semantic conception, in addition to its smooth descendents, via the therapy of outlined expressions. The e-book starts off through concentrating on the mental constraints governing Frege's concept of experience, or which means, and argues that, given those constraints, even the therapy of easy stipulative definitions led Frege to big problems.
Linguistic research of the discussion of Italian cinema, utilizing suggestions and methodologies from pragmatics, dialog research and discourse research.
- Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding
- Pragmatics and natural language understanding
- Theory and Typology of Proper Names
- Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics
- Metadata and Semantics Research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014. Proceedings
Additional info for Modality (Oxford Surveys in Semantics and Pragmatics)
Well, either p is true in w or it’s not. If it’s not, then p → q is true in w, so overall K is true. If it is, then we ask whether q is true in w as well. It is true if q is true in every world accessible from w. Let v be an arbitrary world accessible from w. We already know that p is true in w, and this implies that p is true in v. We also know that ( p → q ) is true in w, and thus p → q is true in v as well. If both p and ( p → q ) are true in v, q is true in v as well. Since v was an arbitrarily chosen world accessible from w, we know that q is true in every world accessible from w; therefore q is true in w.
Because of this diﬀerence, modal logic ignores many important features of the meanings of modal expressions which are important to linguists. g. Cinque 1999). Just as importantly, modal logic does not integrate its ideas about the meanings of modal expressions into a general theory of natural language. 1 and Thomason 2002 for a survey of work in logic), modal logic does not attempt to do this in a comprehensive way. Though semanticists and logicians don’t have the same goals, perhaps semanticists can just modify modal logic so as to make it ﬁt with their goals.
If all of this is true, it is reasonable to say, on a bouletic interpretation, that (49) is true. (53) seems to capture the intuitive reason why it is true: the bouletically accessible worlds are those in which his desires are satisﬁed, and all such worlds are ones in which he tries the cake. Next let’s examine the type of modality in (51). 2) think that there is a kind of historical modality having to do with what the future might be like, given the history which has transpired so far. This is a kind of blended temporal-metaphysical modality based on the intuition that the past is ﬁxed in a way that the future is not.