Download Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, by Nirit Kadmon PDF

By Nirit Kadmon

Formal Pragmatics addresses concerns which are at the borderline of semantics and pragmatics of traditional language, from the viewpoint of a model-theoretic semanticist. This updated source covers a considerable physique of formal paintings on linguistic phenomena, and provides the way in which the semantics-pragmatics interface has grow to be seen this day.

Show description

Read Online or Download Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus PDF

Best semantics books

The Parameter of Aspect

This paintings offers a unified idea of element inside common Grammar. It presents an strange mix of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic methods to a unmarried area, and provides certain linguistic analyses of 5 languages with very various aspectual platforms: English, French, Mandarin chinese language, Navajo and Russian.

Frege on Definitions: A Case Study of Semantic Content

During this brief monograph, John Horty explores the problems offered for Gottlob Frege's semantic thought, in addition to its smooth descendents, by way of the remedy of outlined expressions. The publication starts off by means of concentrating on the mental constraints governing Frege's suggestion of experience, or that means, and argues that, given those constraints, even the remedy of straightforward stipulative definitions led Frege to big problems.

The Discourse of Italian Cinema and Beyond: Let Cinema Speak

Linguistic research of the discussion of Italian cinema, utilizing suggestions and methodologies from pragmatics, dialog research and discourse research.

Additional info for Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus

Sample text

The category mutt traditionally has not been regarded as a special purpose class, but, rather, as a ‘residual category’ (Hays 1974; Hunn 1977: 57-8). Mutts are all those dogs that do not fit into named varieties of dogs such as German shepherd, poodle, pit bull, and so on. Other than the fact that all mutts are dogs, they show no perceptual commonalities, for example, such as do all beagles. Rather, things called mutt are categorically united in terms of the specification that mutts are ‘dogs that do not have varietal names’.

Consequently, it is unlikely that a Gestalt property of ‘game animalness’ could develop. The prototype ‘game animal’, then, is specified in propositional models relating to ‘mammal’ categories. Category Type 5: + A R + GM — P/E To my knowledge, no one before now has developed in significant detail an argument to the effect that some artifactual categories of natural language relate to discontinuities and, hence, have been motivated by Gestalt properties. That such a proposal has not been forthcoming is understandable in part since the utilitarian motivation of artifactual categories is so obvious.

This is not to propose that such categories are always motivated by Gestalt properties. As noted in the above quotation, a student learning to identify the corpus luteum in a rabbit ovary may begin to do so by ‘scanning the attributes’, so at first the category is defined in terms of several features rather than in terms of a single configurational property. However, objects pertaining to most categories of natural language relating to discontinuities, especially folk categories known to all or nearly all speakers of a language (as opposed to specialist categories such as corpus luteum) ordinarily do not require close scrutiny (for pertinent attributes) for the purpose of class inclusion.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.91 of 5 – based on 44 votes