By Gilles Authier
This quantity is a suite of articles thinking about the typology of valency and valence swap in a wide and various pattern of languages that show ergative alignment of their grammar. The pattern of languages represented in those descriptive contributions covers many of the geographical parts and linguistic households during which ergativity has been identified to exist together with well-developed morphological voice, and a few languages belonging to households during which ergativity or voice weren't formerly well-known or properly defined prior to now.
Read Online or Download Ergativity, Valency and Voice PDF
Similar semantics books
This paintings offers a unified thought of element inside of common Grammar. It offers an strange mix of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic techniques to a unmarried area, and offers specific linguistic analyses of 5 languages with very diversified aspectual structures: English, French, Mandarin chinese language, Navajo and Russian.
During this brief monograph, John Horty explores the problems offered for Gottlob Frege's semantic conception, in addition to its smooth descendents, through the therapy of outlined expressions. The publication starts by way of concentrating on the mental constraints governing Frege's concept of experience, or that means, and argues that, given those constraints, even the therapy of straightforward stipulative definitions led Frege to big problems.
Linguistic research of the discussion of Italian cinema, utilizing suggestions and methodologies from pragmatics, dialog research and discourse research.
- The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Aspects of the Evolution of ‘do’ in English
- How to Think about Meaning
- Foundations of Logico-Linguistics: A Unified Theory of Information, Language, and Logic
- Varieties of Tone: Frege, Dummett and the Shades of Meaning
Additional resources for Ergativity, Valency and Voice
Set A on subject of intransitives (‘‘S’’ primitive), in the context of ergative alignment everywhere elsewhere (which would have meant set B for that argument). This situation is summarized in table 6 below. Table 6. Split ergativity by complementation type in Q’anjob’alan languages Intransitive Transitive Main Clause person marking Primitives Complement Clause person marking B V1 B A V1 S PA . . [ A V2itr] . . [B A V2tr] The examples in (8) show how, in main (non-embedded clauses) Jakaltek Popti’ follows the normal ergative alignment pattern of Mayan languages: (8) [Jakaltek Popti’, Craig (1977)] a.
In addition, several factors converge to facilitate syntactic argumentation about the ergative nature of Mayan grammar: for one, transitivity is marked throughout with multiple a‰xations, not just by these person markers, and, furthermore, the segmentability of the forms and their limited involvement in morphophonological processes make them quite transparent and easy to use for syntactic argumentation. 4. 1. Overview of the morphosyntax of the di¤erence voices The presentation of the morphosyntactic characteristics of the Mayan voices will be cast in a framework handling the interaction of the following types of elements:23 21.
In the same way discussions of the existence of antipassive voices in ergative languages were later extended to identifying antipassive-like voices in nonergative languages, as argued early by Postal for French (1977) for instance, the construction Givo´n treats as non-canonical voices, lacking all the morphosyntactic devices of the corresponding canonical voice but functioning in discourse-like one. This is discussed further below. 42 Colette Grinevald and Marc Peake The innovative patterns of text counts proposed by Givo´n for studies of topic continuity in discourse (1983) were also the source of the ‘‘Functional analysis of Akatek voice constructions’’ by Zavala (1997).