By Bjorn Ramberg
This e-book is an creation to and interpretation of the philosophy of language devised by means of Donald Davidson over the last 25 years. The guiding instinct is that Davidson's paintings is better understood as an ongoing try and purge semantics of theoretical reifications. noticeable during this mild the hot assault at the concept of language itself emerges as a typical improvement of his Quinian scepticism in the direction of "meanings" and his rejections of reference-based semantic theories.
Linguistic knowing is, for Davidson, basically dynamic, coming up in basic terms via a continual strategy of conception building and reconstruction. the result's a perception of semantics within which the suggestion of interpretation and never the concept of understanding a language is fundamental.
during his e-book Bjorn Ramberg offers a severe dialogue of reference-based semantic theories, tough the normal bills of the main of charity and elucidating the proposal of radical interpretation. the ultimate bankruptcy on incommensurability ties in with the discussions of Kuhn's paintings within the philosophy of technology and indicates definite hyperlinks among Davidson's analytic semantics and hermeneutic conception.
Read or Download Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language: An Introduction PDF
Similar semantics books
This paintings provides a unified idea of element inside of common Grammar. It presents an strange mixture of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic techniques to a unmarried area, and offers distinct linguistic analyses of 5 languages with very varied aspectual structures: English, French, Mandarin chinese language, Navajo and Russian.
During this brief monograph, John Horty explores the problems provided for Gottlob Frege's semantic thought, in addition to its smooth descendents, through the therapy of outlined expressions. The publication starts by means of concentrating on the mental constraints governing Frege's idea of experience, or that means, and argues that, given those constraints, even the remedy of straightforward stipulative definitions led Frege to big problems.
Linguistic research of the discussion of Italian cinema, utilizing ideas and methodologies from pragmatics, dialog research and discourse research.
- The Theory of Descriptions: Russell and the Philosophy of Language (History of Analytic Philosophy)
- Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax)
- Interfaces + Recursion = Language?: Comsky's Mini-malism and the View from Syntax-Semantics
- Swearing: A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study
- Roland Barthes
- Toward a Reference Grammar of Tok Pisin: An Experiment in Corpus Linguistics (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications)
Extra info for Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language: An Introduction
The short answer is 'satisfaction' . Satisfaction is what T arski actually showed us how to define. A T arskian definition of truth for a language is derived as a special case from the definition of the relation of satisfaction. In order to get at least a rudimentary grip on this concept and its theoretical significance, we must indulge in a brief excursion into the outskirts of logic. Why is it not possible to give an extensional definition of truth directly? This would assume an axiomatic base consistin g of a finite number of elementary sentences and their truth-co nditions, CORRESPONDENCE, SATISFACTION 41 and a recursive clause for each sentential connective, specifying the truth-conditions of composite sentences as a function of the truth-conditions of the atomic sentences and the ways in which they are combined.
The output can hardly be used to test these theories if the conception of the output that will be used in framing the test is based on one of them. (Katz, 1 979, pp. 1 09- 1 1 0) However, the distinction Katz wants to make here is between reference as ultimately an empirical causal relation and reference as determinable by an account of sense prior to it. He claims, rightly, that we cannot construct a counter-example to the inten sional theory of reference that hinges on the assumption that reference is determined by a causal relation : 'there is no way to argue, as Putnam has to argue, from a premise about past references to robot spy devices with the word "cat" to the conclusion that such contraptions constitute the referent of "cat'" (Katz, 1979, p.
29), we could better express this idea by suggesting not that we cannot communicate what we have grasped, but that in so far as we do succeed in communicating our understanding it ensures its own incompleteness by forcing the conceptual or ideological expansion of the object language. By settling for this kind of incompleteness, we capture what is intuitively convincing in the idea of the universality of natural languages (that there cannot be a domain of language somehow beyond and in principle inaccessible to a natural language), without prejudging the ques tion of the possibility of constructing a theory of truth for a natural language.