By Catherine Fuchs, Bernard Victorri
This article offers essays on linguistic matters that come with: continuity and modality; definitions of polysemous phrases; coarse coding and the lexicon; and using continuity in modelling semantic phenomena.
Read Online or Download Continuity in linguistic semantics (Lingvisticae Investigationes Supplementa) PDF
Similar semantics books
This paintings offers a unified idea of element inside common Grammar. It presents an strange mixture of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic techniques to a unmarried area, and provides distinct linguistic analyses of 5 languages with very assorted aspectual structures: English, French, Mandarin chinese language, Navajo and Russian.
During this brief monograph, John Horty explores the problems offered for Gottlob Frege's semantic idea, in addition to its smooth descendents, by means of the remedy of outlined expressions. The booklet starts via targeting the mental constraints governing Frege's thought of feel, or which means, and argues that, given those constraints, even the remedy of straightforward stipulative definitions led Frege to special problems.
Linguistic research of the discussion of Italian cinema, utilizing thoughts and methodologies from pragmatics, dialog research and discourse research.
- Oppositions and ideology in news discourse
- The Composition of Meaning: From Lexeme to Discourse
- Semantics of evidentials
- Semantics of Natural Language
Additional resources for Continuity in linguistic semantics (Lingvisticae Investigationes Supplementa)
If one attempts to outline the general functioning of the term, a certain num ber of uses can be retained as basic (cf. Le Goffic 1992) : a) the interrogative pronoun as in Que fais-tu ? "), Que faire ? ") or, used indirectly, in Je ne sais que faire ("I don't know what to do" ; indirect interrogative examples are more difficult to find). b) "relative without an antecedent", as in Advienne que pourra ("Come what may" "Come whatever may [happen]"), parallel to the use of qui in Rira bien qui rira le dernier ("He who laughs last laughs longest").
If things are to be absolutely discrete, this means that each unit is to be confined to its own place, like a cell or an atom, adjacent to the next one, and so on. The units will not touch each other and will remain by definition separate. Where the contradiction arises, is when one unit gives rise to two, in the process of dissociation, or conversely when two units become a single one, in the process of fusion. Now this does occur, and the history of language bears witness to this, if not abundantly, at least clearly.
Pour une linguistique de rénonciation, t. 1 : Opérations et re présentations, Paris : Ophrys. Joos, M. 1964. The English verb ; form and meaning, University of Wisconsin Press. Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic, New-York : Macmillan. Seiler, HJ. 1952. L'aspect et le temps dans le verbe néo-grec, Paris : Belles Lettres. CONTINUUM IN COGNITION AND CONTINUUM IN LANGUAGE HANS JAKOB SEILER University of Köln, Germany 1. Introduction Continuum is one of the central notions in the work of the UNITYP research group at the University of Cologne1.