By Ofra Magidor
Classification errors are sentences akin to 'Green rules sleep furiously' or 'Saturday is in bed'. They strike us as hugely infelicitous however it is tough to give an explanation for accurately why this can be so. Ofra Magidor explores 4 ways to type error in philosophy of language and linguistics, and develops and defends an unique, presuppositional account.
Read or Download Category mistakes PDF
Similar semantics books
This paintings offers a unified concept of point inside common Grammar. It presents an strange mixture of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic ways to a unmarried area, and provides targeted linguistic analyses of 5 languages with very various aspectual platforms: English, French, Mandarin chinese language, Navajo and Russian.
During this brief monograph, John Horty explores the problems offered for Gottlob Frege's semantic conception, in addition to its sleek descendents, through the therapy of outlined expressions. The publication starts off through targeting the mental constraints governing Frege's inspiration of feel, or which means, and argues that, given those constraints, even the therapy of easy stipulative definitions led Frege to big problems.
Linguistic research of the discussion of Italian cinema, utilizing options and methodologies from pragmatics, dialog research and discourse research.
- The Syntax and Semantics of Discourse Markers
- The Construction of Logical Space
- Recent Advances in the Syntax and Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs)
- Concept Structuring Systems (Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1)
- Rohit Parikh on Logic, Language and Society
- Laboratory Manual for Morphology and Syntax, 7th Edition
Extra resources for Category mistakes
10, and Carnie (2011), p. 16. g. Bouchard (1995), p. 44, Carnie (2002), p. 7, and Denham & Lobeck (2010) p. 287. 57 Indeed, it is not even obvious that ‘semantic anomaly’ is not sometimes taken to be a species of syntactic ill-formedness. g. van Valin (2001), p. 87, Carnie (2002) p. 7. See also Chapter 2 below, for a brief discussion of the potential relevance of more contemporary syntactic theories of argument realization to the topic. 19 INTRODUCTION The idea is that predicative lexical items impose certain restrictions (‘selectional restrictions’), which restrict the kinds of arguments they accept in certain positions.
80, and Sauerland & von Stechow (2001), p. 15413. 7 For a helpful discussion of this issue see Parsons (1995). 8 To put things otherwise, we cannot describe an eating event in which John is the agent and the apple is the theme using the sentence ‘The apple ate John’. While this observation might seem at a first glance to be relevant to a syntactic analysis of category mistakes, it is far from clear that it is. Contemporary syntactic theory may well play a crucial role in ruling out a potential reading of ‘The apple ate John’ in which the sentence means that John ate the apple, but, crucially, this is not a reading where the sentence is interpreted as a category mistake.
By a semantic or a pragmatic theory. So while removing the burden of accounting for category mistakes from syntax would certainly simplify syntax, it is 12 Thomason (1972), p. 211. Even this formulation is too crude, because it requires only what Chomsky has called ‘a descriptively adequate grammar’. But Chomsky places a further desideratum on grammar: that it be ‘explanatorily adequate’ (See Chomsky (1965), pp. 24–7). Chomsky’s original gloss on this further requirement is that the grammar would be psychologically and biologically real, in particular in a way that would explain how language acquisition is possible.